![]() |
|
|
![]() |
|||||||||||||
![]() |
||||||||||||||||
|
![]() |
#14 | |
Registriert seit: 30.10.2005
Ort: Berlin
Beiträge: 1.233
|
Zitat:
Darin heißt es ganz unten, Zitat: "My final thoughts. The Minolta AF 50mm F/1.7 lens turned in a good performance. The good points are: compact, lightweight, low distortion, quick focusing, low color fringing, and is often found on eBay for just over a hundred bucks for a good copy, (original version), mine is a restyled version, but they're the same optically according to the specs. The not-so-good points are; very soft corners with a wide aperture, and a sticky focus ring, neither one is a deal killer for the price. This lens is a little long for an APS-C camera, so you'll have to decide if you can live with an equivalent focal length of 75mm. For full frame users; this lens performs mostly the same as the APS-C coverage, except for light fall-off. See paragraph below. If you can afford to pay the extra money for the 50mm F/1.4, I'd just get that one, it's sharper at the same apertures, from F/1.7-2.8, and offers 2/3 of a stop more light. If you're strapped for cash, and just want a good low-light lens, this is a bargain. Don't worry about the soft corners, you won't notice them with good subjects." Ich habe das 1,4er Minolta-Glas, 1. Vers. Keine Frage, eine schöne Minolta-Linse - und richtig, man muss und kann sich ruhig einmal zwingen, mit einer FB das richtige Foto zu schießen; macht wirklich Spaß!! Hier ein Foto mit dem1,4er ![]() -> Bild in der Galerie Bei f1,6 1/500 sec. ISO 100 aufgenommen. Gleichwohl, man ist in seiner Kreativität etwas eingeschränkt...
__________________
![]() "12 gute Bilder im Jahr, das wäre ein Traum…" (Ansel Adams) |
|
![]() |
![]() |
|
|