Gehen wir mal davon aus, dass außer in diesem Forum noch andere Fotografen auf unserem Globus existieren, die analog und digital in bestmöglicher Qualität herzustellen in der Lage sind.
Wenn es um technische Pedanterie geht, dürfte Joseph Holmes ohne Frage an vorderster Front anzutreffen sein. Der meint nun folgendes... (Geht zwar dort um andere Systeme, aber in diesem Zusammenhang ist das ja unerheblich):
Zitat:
|
The first thing view camera users usually want to know is: Will it match the sheer detail that I can get from my 4x5 sheet film? The answer is an inordinately complicated one. Sometimes, yes, and then some. Sometimes no. [If you ask, can it, then the answer is most certainly yes as we shall see at the end.]
|
Zitat:
|
Dalsa 33 MP and Kodak 39 MP chips are so sharp (sensors do use pixels the size of bacteria) that they reveal the most subtle flaws in any imaging system, or at any rate, far more subtle flaws than color film could reveal. As I mentioned above, the sensors appear to be between three and four times sharper than modern color film, per inch of sensor or film.
|
Quelle:
http://www.josephholmes.com/news-med...precision.html
Zitat:
|
You are correct to assume that quality was the primary motivating factor in my moving to digital capture. For many years already, digital capture methods have offered much better quality for color than chemical methods in some important respects, and we've had to wait to see the achievable resolution with non-scanning systems reach the levels that view camera users are interested in. At first it seemed that single-frame 39 MP backs could not quite match modern 4x5 film results w. respect to detail, but eventually it became clear that this was due to a variety of failures of implementation.
|
Quelle:
http://luminous-landscape.com/forum/...dpost&p=276723
Das deckt sich mit dem, was auch viele andere Fotografen für sich herausgefunden haben... also bei der "Arbeit", sprich beim Fotografieren und Printen von Motiven, nicht beim Fotografieren von Linien.
Und immer wieder stößt man auf den Widerspruch, dass es so ja "eigentlich" nicht sein könnte. Ist aber so... im Ergebnis.