SonyUserforum

gustav1968 · 01.10.2011, 19:25

wwjdo? · 01.10.2011, 19:27

Hallo, Gustav,

das schaut sehr gut aus!

Was mich interssieren würde: wie macht sich die alpha77 in solchen Situationen bei weniger Licht und ISO400-800?

Werden die feinen Gefiederstrukturen dann immer noch detailreich und scharf wieder gegeben?

gustav1968 · 01.10.2011, 20:08

hallo matthias

Ich werde nach ein Bild mit 400 ISO
i shall try to place a picture that is taken with 400 iso

gruben
gustav

wwjdo? · 01.10.2011, 20:18

Zitat:

Zitat von gustav1968

hallo matthias

Ich werde nach ein Bild mit 400 ISO
i shall try to place a picture that is taken with 400 iso

gruben
gustav

Danke Gustav!

Slowlens · 01.10.2011, 20:24

Fine picture, congratulations!

But why did you use the slow shutter time 1/50 sec, ISO 200 with a 300mm lens?

Were you very careful and tried to use ISO as low as possible due to unknown picture quality at higher ISOs with the new camera?

gustav1968 · 01.10.2011, 22:11

Zitat:

Zitat von Slowlens

Fine picture, congratulations!

But why did you use the slow shutter time 1/50 sec, ISO 200 with a 300mm lens?

Were you very careful and tried to use ISO as low as possible due to unknown picture quality at higher ISOs with the new camera?

yes that is right

i alway`s try to take picture`s on 200 ISO , all the camera`s of sony has calebration on 200 ISO , so that is the best ISO for taking picture`s , i have also very-sharp picture`s on 1/15
second , this A77 is a pre-production camera , so not final
thanks for your comment
gustav

Dana · 01.10.2011, 22:29

Gustav, I have a urgent request...

PLEASE take your next photo with a little, small, cheap camera...absolutely unnecessary which one but one of the Sony cameras.

I BET that you also can take a wonderful photo with a small cam instead of a big cam and EVERYBODY who is frightened that an A77 could be not enough (because not good enough) sees that it is mostly only the photographer who makes good pictures!

There are so many crying men in the board who panic because someone important left the Sony-Line and goes to Nikon... when I watch this picture I think it was soooo ridiculus to panic about the A77 and their negative Descriptions... this photo shows that very good pictures are possible...and surely with a smaller cam, too.

The only difference between a good and a bad photo lies in talent, a good view, good work before the photo is taken and in handling the camera the right way, NOT in having the most high tech.

wwjdo? · 02.10.2011, 13:44

Hallo; Dana,

bitte nicht falsch verstehen aber ein wenig konterkarierst du jetzt meine Bitte an Gustav.

Bei ISO200 bekommt man auch mit dem Urgestein Sony A100 ausgezeichnete (bei dem Ausschnitt gar bessere) Bilder hin, keine Frage.

Meine Eisvogellocation, die mir vor Kurzem gezeigt wurde, setzt ISO-Werte voraus, die wesentlich höher sein müssen.
Der Fotograf, der sie mir im Austausch verraten hat, fotografiert dort mit einer 5DII bis ISO1600!

Hallo, Gustav,

da du ein sehr guter Fotograf bist und mit Kameras umgehen kannst, würde ich ISO400 und 800 Bilder, die auch bei "schlechterem" Licht entstanden sind, sehr gerne sehen!

Vielen Dank und LG
Matthias

Slowlens · 02.10.2011, 23:36

http://www.dyxum.com/dforum/my-first...369_page1.html

Gustav,
I've found your thread at Dyxum website with even more of your beautiful pictures with A77.

I think these shine even more than your photos with older cameras. They are more bright and colorful, a bit more presence of the kingfisher as well. I think this is a camera that many of us will like a lot.

Did you use flash or is this all made with natural light?

gustav1968 · 03.10.2011, 17:09

Zitat:

Zitat von Slowlens

http://www.dyxum.com/dforum/my-first...369_page1.html

Gustav,
I've found your thread at Dyxum website with even more of your beautiful pictures with A77.

I think these shine even more than your photos with older cameras. They are more bright and colorful, a bit more presence of the kingfisher as well. I think this is a camera that many of us will like a lot.

Did you use flash or is this all made with natural light?

hi slowlens , i just want to post this link on this forum , thanks for that
what i think , if you compare the A700 with the A77 , is that you have more detail , so you`r right
all the picture`s are taken with natural light , and with the SAL70-400 & SAL 300MM 2.8
the EXIF is in all the picture`s , if you have more questions , please ask me
greetings
gustav

01.10.2011, 19:25	#1
gustav1968 Registriert seit: 30.05.2009 Beiträge: 95	eisvogel mit A77 -> Bild in der Galerie gruben gustav

01.10.2011, 19:27	#2
wwjdo? Registriert seit: 25.01.2006 Ort: Friedberg/By. Beiträge: 11.539	Hallo, Gustav, das schaut sehr gut aus! Was mich interssieren würde: wie macht sich die alpha77 in solchen Situationen bei weniger Licht und ISO400-800? Werden die feinen Gefiederstrukturen dann immer noch detailreich und scharf wieder gegeben? __________________ LG Matthias

01.10.2011, 22:29	#7
Dana Registriert seit: 21.08.2008 Ort: Hessen Beiträge: 34.956	Gustav, I have a urgent request... PLEASE take your next photo with a little, small, cheap camera...absolutely unnecessary which one but one of the Sony cameras. I BET that you also can take a wonderful photo with a small cam instead of a big cam and EVERYBODY who is frightened that an A77 could be not enough (because not good enough) sees that it is mostly only the photographer who makes good pictures! There are so many crying men in the board who panic because someone important left the Sony-Line and goes to Nikon... when I watch this picture I think it was soooo ridiculus to panic about the A77 and their negative Descriptions... this photo shows that very good pictures are possible...and surely with a smaller cam, too. The only difference between a good and a bad photo lies in talent, a good view, good work before the photo is taken and in handling the camera the right way, NOT in having the most high tech. __________________ Liebe Grüße! Blowing out someone else's candle doesn't make yours shine any brighter.

02.10.2011, 13:44	#8
wwjdo? Registriert seit: 25.01.2006 Ort: Friedberg/By. Beiträge: 11.539	Hallo; Dana, bitte nicht falsch verstehen aber ein wenig konterkarierst du jetzt meine Bitte an Gustav. Bei ISO200 bekommt man auch mit dem Urgestein Sony A100 ausgezeichnete (bei dem Ausschnitt gar bessere) Bilder hin, keine Frage. Meine Eisvogellocation, die mir vor Kurzem gezeigt wurde, setzt ISO-Werte voraus, die wesentlich höher sein müssen. Der Fotograf, der sie mir im Austausch verraten hat, fotografiert dort mit einer 5DII bis ISO1600! Hallo, Gustav, da du ein sehr guter Fotograf bist und mit Kameras umgehen kannst, würde ich ISO400 und 800 Bilder, die auch bei "schlechterem" Licht entstanden sind, sehr gerne sehen! Vielen Dank und LG Matthias __________________ LG Matthias

01.10.2011, 20:08	#3
gustav1968 Themenersteller Registriert seit: 30.05.2009 Beiträge: 95	hallo matthias Ich werde nach ein Bild mit 400 ISO i shall try to place a picture that is taken with 400 iso gruben gustav

01.10.2011, 20:24	#5
Slowlens Registriert seit: 02.08.2010 Beiträge: 987	Fine picture, congratulations! But why did you use the slow shutter time 1/50 sec, ISO 200 with a 300mm lens? Were you very careful and tried to use ISO as low as possible due to unknown picture quality at higher ISOs with the new camera?

02.10.2011, 23:36	#9
Slowlens Registriert seit: 02.08.2010 Beiträge: 987	http://www.dyxum.com/dforum/my-first...369_page1.html Gustav, I've found your thread at Dyxum website with even more of your beautiful pictures with A77. I think these shine even more than your photos with older cameras. They are more bright and colorful, a bit more presence of the kingfisher as well. I think this is a camera that many of us will like a lot. Did you use flash or is this all made with natural light?

Sponsored Links

Sponsored Links