Les mal genauer:
Zitat:
The Sony A900 and A850 are not super high ISO cameras. However, after living with the A900 now for thousands of shots, I found the optimal settings and processing techniques for the files that make it just fine for work up to ISO 1000 … as judged by looking at prints rather than 200% on-screen pixel peeping exercises on a 30” computer monitor. My wedding clients don’t look at images that way, they see the prints. What noise it does produce above ISO 800 is nicer than most any other DSLR I’ve used, and takes on more of a pleasing film grain look when shot at ISOs 1250 and above. Plus, for my work, I found that I rarely exceeded ISO 1000, so performance above that was less critical for me. When noise has been an issue, a slight application of software like Nik Define 2, used sparingly and selectively does the job. However, a one stop better ISO performance from Sony would be welcome IMO.
Quelle: http://photo.net/wedding-photography-forum/00V98v
Only you can determine if higher ISO performance is a real need. If so, the better bet could be a Canon 5D/5DMKII or Nikon D700/D3/D3s.
|
Leider kennt bzw. zu der Zeit kannte er noch nicht das neue ACR, DxO Optics Pro, Capture One und Aperture für Mac wohl ein Fremdwort für ihn...
Wenigstens ist er aber ehrlich und sagt, dass High-ISO in Prints nicht so sehr auffallen bzw. bei den Prints für seine Kunden und die High-ISO Performance gegenüber so manch anderer D-SLR doch nicht so schlecht ist bzw. er kennt schlimmeres.
